Wed 19 Jul 2006
OK, this is a bit far out and freaky and I haven’t tried to state it succinctly before, but here goes.
First, I dont’ think JK has spent countless hours developing a children’s story about the clash of good and evil to have good done in in the end by evil, I see several possibilities but they revolve around tried and true literary themes.
If the story represents one go round in a Cycle Of Clashes Between Good and Evil, then Dumbledore previously had a mentor, just as he is mentor to Harry. His triumph over “the dark wizard Grendelwald” or whatever it is that it says on his chocolate frogs card was his life turning point, changing him from hero to Merlin-like figure. Likewise the former dark lord’s defeat cleared the way for Voldemort to become the current dark lord with Snape as his protege in waiting. Because Dumbledore understood this cycle, he recruited Snape to secretly defeat Voldemort so that Snape can become the new Dark Lord for the next cycle. The conflict which results in the defeat of th Dark Lord will transform Harry into the next mentor for good, who will have to find the hero who can defeat Snape when his powers are fully realized. (how slytherin-y this would be, Snape going to any length, even the doing of good, to attain his evil ends).
If this is the Story of the Self Sacrificing Hero (think Christ themes), then Harry must die for the defeat of the Dark Lord but he and/or Dumbledore will somehow defeat death through the power of love. His “spell” to kill Voldemort entails his own death, but somehow, he emerges beyond death showing us that the “power the dark lord knows not” is the ultimate magic.
The Last Missing Piece theme - here we have been told time and again the four houses must unite to save Hogwarts (read defeat the Dark Lord), but where is the help from Slytherin? My answer is that Slughorn finally turns the tide. Here is where comes to play the importance of Harry having “lilly’s eyes,” when Slughorn overcomes his own natural incinations, nurtures harry through the last hurdles, and brings along the reluctant Slytherin students at Hogwarts into a “unity” that makes the forces of good which defeat Voldemort in the end a ‘whole, greater than the sume of their parts.”
OK, clearly I’ve been giving this way to much thought. =P
October 7th, 2006 at 2:56 pm
I hate this theory.
Who says there is required to be a Dark Lord?
Nothing…not even love can overcome death (if you mean “overcome death” as coming back to life.)
When referring to Dumbledore’s extreme magical prowess Joe told us that Dumbledore has had a few teachers but is mainly self taught. Therefore implying that he did NOT have a mentor to teach him.
At the Hall of Prophecies the two prophecies that smashed are prominent. “At the Solstice will come anew…and nothing will come after.” I personally think this refers to the dark lord. harry defeats Voldemort at the solstice and none will come after (no more dark lord will come after).
What if Snape was 100% good now? then BAM your theory is gone. Joe said that every char. except Voldy is redeemable
Saying that there HAS to be a dark lord is just trying to make theories.
October 22nd, 2006 at 3:30 pm
I’m moved more towards the cycle of heroes theory after reading the Machiavelli’s Half-Blood Prince essay by BJ Texan on Mugglenet.
I think it explains a lot - that Harry is right all along Snape, too.